“ODM Must Die, For it to Live”~Mutahi Ngunyi

Political commentator Mutahi Ngunyi recently argued that “ODM must die, for it to live,” drawing from the Biblical imagery in John 12:24. 

His message implies that the Orange Democratic Movement may need a symbolic ending to enable genuine renewal and relevance.

ODM emerged from political shifts surrounding the 2005 constitutional referendum. 

It positioned itself as a reform-driven party committed to expanding democracy, advancing devolution, and promoting social justice, quickly establishing a firm presence in Kenya’s political landscape.

Founders such as Raila Odinga, Musalia Mudavadi, and Charity Ngilu played essential roles in shaping ODM’s early identity. 

Their leadership elevated the party’s national profile and helped cement its place as a major opposition force.

Across two decades, ODM has grown into a widely recognized party with strong national influence. 

However, changing voter expectations and internal generational differences now raise questions about its ability to adjust to Kenya’s evolving political environment.

Ngunyi emphasizes the importance of generational transition, arguing that younger and more dynamic leaders—often labeled the “Young Turks”—should take the lead. He believes this shift would refresh the party’s internal structure and modernize its public appeal.

Invoking the grain-of-wheat metaphor, Ngunyi suggests ODM must let go of outdated narratives and long-standing political myths. 

He argues that relinquishing dependence on older power centers is necessary for the party to remain relevant and adaptable.

Raila Odinga, a defining figure within ODM for many years, significantly shaped its ethos and direction. 

His recent passing has intensified discussions on succession, placing greater urgency on reorganizing leadership while upholding the movement’s reformist foundation.

Kenya has repeatedly witnessed tension between veteran politicians and younger contenders across multiple parties. 

ODM now confronts similar pressures, needing to preserve its legacy while modernizing to fit the expectations of today’s electorate.

Although Ngunyi’s viewpoint may energize supporters of internal change, it could also spark resistance among loyalists who view drastic transformation as disrespectful to founding leaders. 

The party’s future stability depends on balancing innovation with tradition to prevent internal fractures.