The choices offered were John Mbadi, Aden Duale, Hassan Joho and Kipchumba Murkomen.
What followed was a long thread of comments that revealed mixed feelings, sharp criticism and pockets of support for each of the four.
Supporters of Kipchumba Murkomen praised his public visibility and his spirited communication approach, arguing that he is one of the few officials who regularly explains government decisions to the public.
Some comments described him as the most active and engaging, noting that he often places himself at the centre of major national conversations.
Aden Duale also attracted attention, with a group of commenters naming him among the most dependable and steady hands in government.
Those who backed him pointed to his long experience in leadership and said he carries himself with confidence whenever national matters arise.
Hassan Joho received support from those who feel the government needs a fresh and more relatable face.
These users argued that his energy, diplomacy and national appeal could bring a new tone to the Cabinet if given more space to operate.
John Mbadi was mentioned by several contributors who said he has shown a calm and methodical approach in his work.
Some described him as a voice of reason in moments when political pressure is high, and praised what they see as a disciplined style of leadership.
However, a large section of commenters dismissed all four choices entirely.
Their responses showed frustration with the entire leadership class, insisting that none of the listed officials has met the expectations of ordinary citizens.
For them, performance remains far below what the country urgently needs.
The discussion demonstrated the deep divide in public sentiment, revealing that Kenyans are still searching for leaders who can convincingly deliver change in challenging times.
0 Comments